Overview
The AIM Framework provides a neuroscientifically grounded foundation for understanding health behaviors. By distinguishing between appetitive needs, intrinsic motivations, and mimetic desires, we can better predict and explain health outcomes, design effective interventions, and create sustainable health policies.
AIM distinguishes genuine physiological needs (A) from socially amplified health behaviors (M), enabling more targeted interventions. Many health challenges involve multiple sources: obesity may combine appetitive dysregulation with mimetic eating patterns; exercise adherence may depend on intrinsic enjoyment versus appearance-based motivation. By identifying which motivational source drives a behavior, health policy can design interventions that address root causes rather than treating all health behaviors as responding to the same incentives.
Key Health Phenomena
AIM predicts that health interventions targeting the wrong motivational source will fail. For example, social comparison-based fitness programs may initially attract participants through mimetic desire but show poor long-term adherence because they don't develop intrinsic motivation. Conversely, obesity interventions that address only appetitive needs without recognizing mimetic eating (eating more when dining with high-status others) will miss a key behavioral driver. AIM enables precise diagnosis: Is this behavior driven by physiological need, intrinsic health engagement, or social comparison?
Obesity: Appetite vs. Mimetic Eating
How obesity interventions must distinguish between genuine appetitive needs and mimetic eating behaviors driven by social comparison and status signaling.
Healthcare Access & Intrinsic Motivation
How intrinsic motivation drives health-seeking behavior and why extrinsic incentives may undermine long-term health engagement.
Health Status & Mimetic Desire
How health becomes a status symbol through mimetic desire, leading to both positive health behaviors and harmful comparison patterns.
Policy Design for Different Sources
How health policies must account for different motivational sources, from basic appetitive needs to complex mimetic health behaviors.
Novel Testable Predictions
Prediction 6: Social Dining Amplifies Intake ONLY When Models Are Eating More
What AIM Uniquely Predicts: Social dining increases food intake through mimetic mechanisms, meaning: eating amplifies when observing others eat MORE than baseline, effect disappears when dining companion eats LESS, effect is strongest when the model is high-status/attractive.
Why This Is Novel: Existing research shows "social eating increases intake" but doesn't test DIRECTION. AIM predicts it's mimetic (matching the model) not just social presence. Can test by manipulating confederate's eating behavior.
Required: Nutrition research partnership, 3-month field study
Status: Seeking nutrition research partnership
Falsification: If Condition B = Control, it's not mimetic but just "social eating"
Prediction 7: Flow-Based Exercise Programs Outperform Appearance-Based Programs at 12+ Months
What AIM Uniquely Predicts: Exercise programs designed around intrinsic rewards (mastery, flow, competence) will show better long-term adherence than programs designed around mimetic rewards (body image, social comparison, appearance goals).
Why This Is Novel: Fitness research shows "intrinsic motivation predicts adherence" (established). AIM adds: Can DESIGN programs to maximize wᵢ vs wₘ through specific features. Predicts which program elements drive which source.
Required: Fitness industry partnership, 12-month longitudinal study
Status: Seeking fitness industry partnership
Falsification: If both programs show equal retention, I vs M design distinction fails
Key Research Questions
- • What proportion of health behaviors are driven by appetitive needs versus mimetic desire, and how does this vary across populations?
- • Can health interventions designed around intrinsic motivation (mastery, flow) outperform appearance-based programs long-term?
- • How do social dining contexts amplify or suppress appetitive eating through mimetic mechanisms?
- • What policy interventions can protect intrinsic health motivation while addressing basic health needs?
- • How does AIM explain health disparities across different populations?
Policy Implications
Health policy informed by AIM would:
- Ensure basic health needs are met (appetitive sufficiency) as foundation for other interventions
- Design public health campaigns that support intrinsic health engagement rather than relying solely on fear or social comparison
- Recognize when health behaviors are mimetically driven and address social dynamics rather than individual choice
- Create healthcare systems that preserve patient autonomy and intrinsic motivation for health
- Target interventions based on motivational source diagnosis rather than one-size-fits-all approaches
Nutrition Policy
Designing nutrition interventions that address appetitive needs while reducing harmful mimetic eating.
Mental Health Systems
Creating mental health systems that support intrinsic motivation and address mimetic social dynamics.
Healthcare Delivery
Designing healthcare delivery systems that account for different motivational sources in patient behavior.
Interested in Health Policy Research?
We're seeking health policy researchers to test AIM predictions and explore applications in your field.
Contact Us to Collaborate