Organizations & the AIM Framework

From status tournaments to mission-driven work through source-specific interventions

⚠️

These are testable predictions, not established findings.

We're seeking researchers to validate these hypotheses.Access research materials →

Overview

The AIM Framework provides a neuroscientifically grounded foundation for understanding organizational behavior. By distinguishing between appetitive needs, intrinsic motivations, and mimetic desires, we can better predict and explain workplace dynamics, design effective organizational structures, and create sustainable work environments.

AIM reveals how organizations can shift from status tournaments (mimetic competition for scarce markers) to mission-driven work (intrinsic engagement). Many organizational dysfunctions arise from single-metric recognition systems that create mimetic convergence—everyone competing for the same scarce status markers. By diversifying recognition, ensuring basic needs are met, and protecting intrinsic motivation, organizations can reduce rivalry and increase innovation.

Key Organizational Phenomena

Traditional performance management often conflates motivational sources: using the same metrics for appetitive compensation (fair pay), intrinsic engagement (meaningful work), and mimetic status (recognition). AIM predicts this creates dysfunction. For example, ranking employees by single metrics intensifies mimetic rivalry while undermining intrinsic motivation. Organizations with diversified recognition across multiple dimensions reduce rivalry because employees can't converge on a single scarce marker. Leadership that supports autonomy and mastery fosters intrinsic motivation, while command-and-control approaches trigger either mimetic competition or appetitive compliance.

Organizational Culture and Motivation

How organizational cultures can support intrinsic motivation while addressing basic appetitive needs (fair compensation, work-life balance) that affect performance.

Leadership and Intrinsic Motivation

How leadership styles can either support or undermine intrinsic motivation, and the role of mimetic desire in leadership dynamics.

Team Dynamics and Mimetic Patterns

How team dynamics are shaped by mimetic patterns of competition and collaboration, and strategies for creating healthier team environments.

Status Tournaments vs. Mission-Driven Work

How organizations can shift from status tournaments driven by mimetic desire to mission-driven work supported by intrinsic motivation.

Novel Testable Predictions

Prediction 11: Diversified Recognition Prevents Mimetic Convergence on Single Status Marker

What AIM Uniquely Predicts: When organizations recognize achievements across multiple dimensions (creativity, collaboration, technical skill, mentorship), mimetic rivalry decreases because employees can't converge on a SINGLE scarce marker. This reduces wₘ-driven competition and preserves wᵢ.

Why This Is Novel: Management research shows "recognition matters" but doesn't explain rivalry dynamics. AIM predicts that single metrics (sales numbers, publications) create mimetic tournaments. Diversification disperses mimetic targets, reducing rivalry.

Test Design: Compare teams with different recognition systems: Single-metric (ranked by one KPI) vs Multi-metric (recognized across 5-7 different dimensions). Track employee retention, reported burnout, innovation metrics, political behavior.
Required: HR analytics partnership, 12-month organizational tracking
Timeline: 12-month organizational tracking
Status: Seeking HR analytics partnership

Falsification: If single-metric performs better, mimetic rivalry mechanism fails

Key Research Questions

  • • Does diversified recognition across multiple dimensions reduce mimetic rivalry and increase employee retention?
  • • How do different organizational structures affect the balance between intrinsic motivation and status competition?
  • • Can organizations measure and track shifts between motivational sources in workplace behavior?
  • • What leadership practices protect intrinsic motivation while ensuring basic organizational needs are met?
  • • How does AIM explain patterns of organizational culture and change?

Organizational Implications

Organizational practice informed by AIM would:

  1. Diversify recognition across multiple dimensions to prevent mimetic convergence on single status markers
  2. Ensure fair compensation and work conditions (appetitive sufficiency) as foundation for intrinsic engagement
  3. Design roles that support autonomy and mastery rather than pure compliance
  4. Identify when organizational conflict stems from mimetic rivalry versus resource scarcity or autonomy constraints
  5. Create cultures that value mission-driven work over status competition

Organizational Design

Designing organizational structures that support intrinsic motivation while addressing basic needs.

Leadership Development

Creating leadership development programs that support intrinsic motivation and reduce mimetic rivalry.

Workplace Culture

Designing workplace cultures that protect curiosity and support mission-driven work.

Interested in Organizational Research?

We're seeking organizational researchers to test AIM predictions and explore applications in your field.

Contact Us to Collaborate